Talk:Mojave Desert

Mojave Desert was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 22, 2021	Good article nominee	Not listed
September 1, 2021	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

California: Southern California Top‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada

Deserts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Deserts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Deserts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DesertsWikipedia:WikiProject DesertsTemplate:WikiProject DesertsDeserts

Ecoregions Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Ecoregions, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of ecoregions. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on these topics. See WikiProject Ecoregions and Wikipedia:FAQ/Contributing.EcoregionsWikipedia:WikiProject EcoregionsTemplate:WikiProject EcoregionsEcoregions
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona / Utah Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Mid-importance).

Weather: Climate Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Area in infobox

I've removed the area from the infobox - it was recently added as 48,000 sq mi from this source, but the infobox formatting messed it up. Seems it expects km2 and won't accept anything else or a ref tag. Vsmith (talk) 12:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The area in the first paragraph does not match the area in the infobox. The infobox lists the size as more than double of the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.154.162.16 (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

discrepancy re: size of the Mojave Desert

There is inconsistency with respect to the size of the Mojave Desert in Wikipedia articles. The main article (Mojave Desert https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojave_Desert )has the size at 47,877 square miles. However, the List of North American Deserts article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_North_American_deserts )list the size of the Mojave as 22,000 square miles. A link in the latter article, to geology.com has yet another size, 54,000 square miles. Brooklyn Maloney (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Brooklyn[reply]

Highways

J Yooitzleo (talk) 05:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mojave Desert/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this one's gonna have to be a quickfail.

The climate section is almost completely unsourced
weather2travel.com is used as a source for temperature data; it is an unreliable source
the geography section is unsourced, and also incomplete. We'll want to know about specific natural features
Cities and regions is mainly unsourced
The natural features such as Devils Playground in the cities and features section could possibly go in the geography section or something like that
Highways and major roads is a single sentences; needs expansion
Parks and tourism is largely unsourced
the list of musuems should be a prose paragraph
the flora section needs expanded
The fauna section should not just be a giant list
Soil and plant conditions and protection sections are both unsourced and too short. More detail is needed on these topics
The West Mojave plan litigation is undue weight.
Too many see also links - see MOS:SEEALSO
What makes constructioncompany.com a reliable source?
what makes parlorsongs.com a reliable source
All items in lead should be in body, there is stuff like the native name that is unique to the lead.

This is nowhere near to the GA criteria, so I will have to quickfail it, unfortunately. Hog Farm _Talk 23:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the helpful criticism. I will begin working on this immediately. AurumIsGold (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mojave Desert/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 10:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will add comments later. Sounder Bruce 10:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of September 1, 2021, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The article needs heavy copyediting. Lines such as "Relatively, there is not much riverine activity" indicate a poor level of writing, while other sections aren't easy to understand for laymen. A few sections devolve into chains of links with no comments between them, making for an extremely tedious read.

2. Verifiable?: Several paragraphs are still missing inline citations.

3. Broad in coverage?: Most sections are far too undeveloped for a subject of this size and scope. The human development section is a measly paragraph about recent development but does not mention the historic development of the region, let alone the indigenous inhabitants.

4. Neutral point of view?: The article is skewed towards recent events and thus leaves out some points of view.

5. Stable?:

Pass

6. Images?: Far too many decorative images, but few that convey the size of the desert itself (perhaps a satellite view).

It's clear that this was a premature nomination and that the improvements made since the last nomination were not sufficient. I would suggest not nominating this article again until after consulting another venue such as peer review only after addressing the major scope issues raised.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Sounder Bruce 04:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Information Studies

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 March 2022 and 14 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BDerequito (article contribs). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angerbodha (talk • contribs) 14:41, 7 April 7 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 2 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ricky.jones91 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ricky.jones91 (talk) 03:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricky.jones91: Thanks for your contributions. Please read WP:PUFFERY for some tips about how to write in a neutral factual tone for Wikipedia. — hike395 (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]